Game/289/pokemon-silver _version_(color)/

theological reasons to reject blood transfusions ... so it goes!

The Pirula (freelance reporter apostate)

Awake December 22, 1964, page 16

Dear comrades victims of tombolesca pseudoteología watchtoweriana:

Today The Pirula , it looks in a seamless task. But who is this employee in the shadows? It behaves like a climb, but the guy works with the Resistance Apostate. Female friendly and open, with languages and good manners ... excellent for mixing and to disappear among such an illustrious and unlearned troops! His territory is the center of the peninsula. Speech as a Cicero - of those that like both TH - but has the weakness of working in the underground resistance to the Honorable Apostate.

has been kind enough to refer to a theological considerations by the Governing Body Bank. Despite having no known academic studies, they are not even a hair cut when the troop train in the theocratic spirit watchtoweriano. History demonstrates time and again, that its theological foundations expire before the milk cool in summer, but the ideologues do not care! What people are killed in the meantime? We must die all die, some sooner and some later, but here there is nobody to seed! And while we are dying, what better way to choose your death and look like a champion, dying for the sake of truth expires?

few years ago, Jehovah's Witnesses had a conscience that prevented them from accepting human organ transplants and vaccines to prevent disease. Today, miraculously, all Jehovah's Witnesses have no objection conscience to accept such medical treatment. The reason? The religious denomination that argued against this, it stopped and gave them carte blanche to the Witnesses in these treatments. How many Jehovah's Witnesses could not accept transplants die or vaccines? "Hundreds? Miles? Who cares! They exercised their freedom to choose medical treatment ..., with dire consequences, by the way!

Some of the pearls with which they give away the beggars without borders:

also shows the folly of making medical opinions the law of the country, which is what is done when the courts support the recommendations of doctors faced with objections from patients. According to you, who should advise the judges on medical treatment, medical or religious affiliation? Is insentato when a judge determines that the prescription must be followed to save a child, for example, with a blood transfusion ... against the will of the parents indoctrinated and coerced by religious denomination?

is true, the patient can die if treatment does not accept recommended. But it is just as true that many who accept treatment recommended die anyway, some as a result of treatment suggested. The point established here is that there is no guarantee of success. So the final decision to accept or reject a specific treatment has to retain the individual. Male, warranty, guarantee ... as you do not! This is not like going to buy a melon, by the way, which is not guaranteed. Let's see, medical practice is carried out competently (care and skill), effectiveness and efficiency. It is true that there are people who is in the operating room, but is infinitely greater number of life-saving. But the argument "theological" From as there is no guarantee of success, better than everyone - without being a doctor or take medicine pajorera idea - make a decision that pleases because ultimately all we die ... as not! Medical protocols are based on experience and scientific and statistical studies, etc.. What underpins the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses to reach these bizarre conclusions? Especially

selection personnel must be respected when the decision of an individual is based on religious grounds, as in the case of blood transfusion. So especially when this decision is based on religious beliefs? For example, last September, more than sixty children died in Zimbabwe because their parents did not want to be vaccinated against measles ... because of their religious beliefs. According to religious beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses, the state must guarantee this right to parents ... because this decision is based on religious beliefs. Http://johnhenrykurtz.blogspot.com/2010/10/64-ninos-mueren-al-no-vacunarse-por.html

Moreover, within Hinduism - another religious confession - we have the religious tradition of Sati : the religious ritual of burning alive the widow of the deceased in the cremation pyre her husband. As a decision based on religious beliefs, the English government should also ensure this right. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sat% C3% AD_ (ritual)

Another decision based on religious beliefs should respect the English state would be the removal of the clitoris. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ablaci% C3% C3% ADtoris B3n_de_cl%

Do we? What I want to clarify? religious beliefs should not be grounds to consider where they might endanger the health or safety of persons. In this case, which argues the religious faith of the Jehovah's Witnesses have no sense and is typical of religious fundamentalism that medical science should be above the rule of law under whose duty is to protect the life of the citizens.

The Christian is not about forcing others to adopt their point of view. Well, I have some notes to make. First, do not require parent's religion to their children to decide for them that they are given blood transfusions? When religious faith threat to its members with disassociation with the implications of the dissident in life (social and family environment are required to make the vacuum), can say that Jehovah's Witness walk a decision of this magnitude ... without coercion? https: / / picasaweb.google.com / formerwitness / CENTRODEDOCUMENTACIONPERMANENTESOBRELAEXPULSIONENLOSTESTIGOSDEJEHOVA #

Are doctors and judges who conspire against the freedom of an individual, which prohibit choose their medical treatment, who are a threat to society, one because they deny the God-given right and legal freedom of choice . have already thrown at the mouth! Yes, threat to health and physical integrity of persons, not the one who determines the changing doctrines in the religious denomination, but the judges and practitioners who seek to save the lives of children or people. The agents

Watch gives teeth on edge when you type its Governing Body is exposed to light, in the eyes of the world. Instead of writing an opinion about what the church body of their religious and try to defend their position with arguments, are devoted to free and demeaning attacks against those who think freely with their comments on the brutality that writes its Governing Body . His only argument is the ultra desperate attack against apostates Iberian and overseas.

Funny, observed a complete silence on the nonsense written in the official publications of their own religion. While engaged - unsuccessfully - to try as hard as success burst this blog.

Action for the post:
share this information with our family physician and fellow students and teachers at the university or college.