on many complex challenges that contemporary liberalism has to confront and to which should give an answer appropriate. Participation in this comment those that seem most significant from the perspective of Mexico, a country on the periphery of the Western world as some say that is developing. It is therefore the point of view of a first-world liberal avencindado in the U.S. or Europe. So this is a critical liberal ideological stance. Therefore, before entering comment sde challenges, we must begin by noting that the Primea of \u200b\u200bthem, or the prerequisite to other challenges, is the critical and self-critical attitude that everything should be liberal in regard to itself and world in which we live. Without such self-criticism, liberalism certainly lost much of its value and importance. criticality, with individualism and freedom are the pillars of the building liberal. Pr therefore, of what it is to be critical of everything, including his own liberalism, which as any philosophical theory and ideological stance should be under constant review to be with the times and situations of today. The worst thing a liberal can do is rest on their laurels and become complacent and apathetic. The defense of individuals and their freedoms and rights is not over and there is no overtones of this happening in the short to medium term. Today, new problems and challenges are presented to the Liberals, and they must know properly confront. Hence the need to emphasize the self-critical, serious and responsible. Met the challenge of self-criticism, then you can meet the challenge of criticizing other different philosophical and ideological trends and liberalism and closely passed another challenge, you can criticize the current situation with the full awareness that is the theory which should adapt to reality without losing its fundamental essence. The prretención contrary is not only irrational and absurd, but also ineffective in real life economic, political and social.
Among the most significant challenges of our time, is likely to defend the individual against large public organizciones eimpersonales private, which reduces the number, to a role or a function, forgetting that a person with a series of physical, mental, emotional and psychological that make it unique. Large organizations tend to massively minimize the individual and to consider a dispensable part of the administrative or operational, thus violating the principle of primacy of the individual. Retrieve, defend, maintain a high value and regard for the individual and their rights and freedoms, it remains a basic and fundamental task of prime importance for the Liberals. And neither can nor should enable the organization or company from abusing its power over the individual. Similarly it is not an individual persmisible handedly impose its authority and power over an entire organization.
Another challenge, not least is to avoid confusion between individual freedom and selfishness. Individual freedom, as argued by the Liberal Proclamation 1981, holds that individual freedom is given in the context of the community, group and society, which certainly implies that the individual will be responsible for and solidarity with other men of their society. Recall that the liberal idea is that whoever is truly free, and I could become and do what you want in life is better position to encourage and motivate other humans to do just the same, try to be as free as possible, as far as the situation permits. It is also better positioned to be more responsible and mutually. Individual liberty is no property in the oppression of others, but in the freedom of others. So, be liberal, individualistic sr does not mean being selfish or mean, or irresponsible or unsupportive.
SHIPPING OUR PUBLICATION AUTHORIZED POST, TIMELINESS, VENEZUELA, opinions, news, liberal republican democracy, liberal, liberal, Libertarian, POLICY, INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, UNITY, DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVE
0 comments:
Post a Comment