Perseverance is invincible. That is why time in its action, destroys and tears down all power. Plutarch
1 .- SOCIALISM AND POVERTY. GODOY SAUL GOMEZ
2 .- CHAVEZ CONCERNED. EDITORIAL. JOURNAL, GUATEMALA
3 .- TYRANTS TO THE WIND OF FREEDOM. ALFREDO Jaeggli
Hope Force moves. Be strong, go ahead and work. We only have 653 days, inexorable countdown. Article 231. 1999 Constitution. The new president will take office on 10/01 the first year of his constitutional term .- @ Raulamiel
SOCIALISM AND POVERTY. GODOY SAUL GOMEZ
Poverty has, among other economic reasons, and although it is a complex phenomenon could be explained as a direct result of inequalities that are born with man. In a society will always be people who receive less than others, if the distribution was equitable and based on "needs", as claimed by the Communists, just not reach for all, we too, live is expensive and if the state is socialist, surely will go against the productive sectors (taking away resources, controlling your earnings) which would inevitably diminish the ability of that society to create wealth, there will be less than distribute. In addition, there are always priorities for the Socialists would keep the state represented by its leader, his cronies (party) and the repressive apparatus which should have, which means a high expenditure of resources because their lifestyles and living expenses need thick-budget items, but without that state would be impossible to maintain the illusion that they are doing "justice social ".
Classical liberalism and capitalism are policies that have historically proven more capable of producing wealth, the best allocate resources and providing better quality of life for societies that put into practice, his promise is to multiply the resources for the general prosperity amid a climate of freedom and clear rules, but if something does not intend to eliminate poverty, which is impossible because of poverty, although can be decreased, can not be eradicated.
Capitalism rewards entrepreneurship and work in an environment of competition where the interests at stake and the preparation of individual lifestyle to which you aspire and will have in achieving their goals, which creates competition which work less, which is less prepared, that lacks interest and initiative, earn less, so there will always be income inequality. Apart from these conditions, deny the talents and skills of people in certain circumstances are benefits that will stand out above the rest of their peers, but their success is reflected in the general prosperity, with their businesses generate job opportunities, and goods and services to society.
already noted Benjamin Franklin: "I agree to do good to the poor, but differ in the way of how to do it. I think the best way to do good to the poor is not poverty make it easy, but guide them and encourage them to leave it. " Franklin said that in his travels he had observed that the more the poor will be provided with amenities and services, the more taxes were imposed on the rich to serve the poor, more insolent, violent, vicious and they loose behaved. These policies they did was increase in poverty, he said.
Socialism uses the poor, inequality to promote the worst possible solution, make the state a local controller and a violator of human rights stripped of wealth to those who have and have worked, and supposedly give to the poor people under the premise that the rich stole from the poor and nationalizations, expropriations and confiscations are ways to make "social justice", to return to the homeless as originally belonged to them, which more than one argument is an excuse, a lie generate populist abuse, theft and general backwardness.
The socialist state does not create wealth, are unable to do as it strives to destroy the private productive and inefficient public enterprises, the only way they make a threat of equality in income distribution is, inevitably, with the general impoverishment, the destruction of society, mainly achieved when distributed according to need, regardless of the effort and work that should give the beneficiaries of compensation.
Thus They strip to their societies, subject to a police state and control, prohibiting the fundamental rights of private property, free speech and information, press freedom and persecute dissidents to keep in power a political organization enjoying all the privileges and wealth on behalf of the poor.
And it's very easy to convince the hurt, resentment is fed by envy and the belief that a person who does not work that contributes nothing to society, which has no talent can access to lifestyle and income that does not deserve, and can, through theft, assault, rape or the simple inscription on the ruling party to terminate those that have worked and risked their assets to obtain property or industry, for them to sit in the manager's office and his ignorance and bad faith ruin a company that nothing has side, and that does not hurt (the case of the CVG is a pathetic example of what I explain.)
But there is something even worse, the socialist governments fund other socialist states to subjugate their people and ruining their economies, all on behalf of the poor.
CHAVEZ CONCERNED. EDITORIAL. JOURNAL, GUATEMALA
Last Sunday, the government program "Alo Presidente, the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, again condemned the intervention of the international coalition in Libya warned the U.S. president, Barack Obama, that "not even think about Venezuela."
Chavez threatened that if an intervention of this kind will take place in Venezuela "would fall on this earth millions of Guaicaipuro (Caciques) of lancers. In Venezuela not even think, Mr. Obama. " He also denounced the bombings are causing civilian casualties, "Sure, throw 300 or 400 bombs from the sea and the bombs fall where they fall: homes, hospitals (...) How very unforgiving (...) They are indiscriminate bombing (...) If we assist a country in an internal conflict is not throwing bombs. "
Chavez accused the U.S. and its allies launched an offensive to seize Libyan oil and warned that seek to do the same with creating a climate Venezuela of violence that culminated in the 2012 presidential election. "I know the plans I have with Venezuela, violating the country, create conditions for 2012: that not even think!" Said Chavez.
"They are even saying that Chávez lost, and that if you win is by fraud. They will try to create a violent situation before, during or after the election, so I call the Venezuelans are able to think rationally: neutralize these factors of violence, who want to create chaos and in 2002, "Chavez said.
should be noted that, following the events in Libya, which threaten to collapse the regime of Muammar Gaddafi, has been speculated that this could take refuge in Venezuela, the only country that is allegedly dare to give asylum despite being accused of grotesque and unforgivable crimes against humanity. In any case, please note that in September 2009, the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, gave his "revolutionary friend" Gaddafi the highest recognition that can give the Venezuelan government: the replica of the sword of Simon Bolivar .
Of course, Chávez fails to address the terrible attacks against civilian targets Libyan regime and the intolerance that supine "Gaddafi clan" has led to the opposition and dissent as well as to a Libyan population impoverished and starving desperately fighting for better living conditions.
TYRANTS TO THE WIND OF FREEDOM. ALFREDO Jaeggli
When will the wind blowing in favor of the freedom fighters to North Korea and Cuba? Desperate wind of freedom that you breathe in northern Africa and the Middle East, Chávez and Evo and put their beards to soak and cry against humanitarian intervention adopted by the United Nations. Lugo, apprenticed to them, also castigated the deployment of Allied forces against the tyranny of Gaddafi. Not surprisingly, for the XXI century socialism commitment to absolutism as a political system of government.
three months ago, the immolation a Tunisian accelerated history in that part of the world, but this wind lessened when Gadhafi seized the position and decided to murder his nation to stay in power. To hope for freedom, who returned last weekend with a Security Council resolution for military intervention, expect a battle to the death, as the Nero of Tripoli vowed to fight until death.
This confrontation that shakes the world is taken for something as old as man himself: the sense of freedom. The war for freedom has always developed between the individual against collectivism, for this to be imposed must submit to that. The man is an end in itself and not a means for the accomplishment of others or of a political system as claimed by the governments of North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia. I long for this wind reaches them now banished the tyranny of Gaddafi.
Chavez and the rest of the XXI century socialism still have the opportunity to hear the individual and rectify the political direction of their nation, if not, are bound to routed into exile before the wind of freedom that is now in North Africa and Middle East. The flow of this air will come to your country if you do not break the chains that now remain tied to the freedom fighters.
Meanwhile, Lugo should change his speech to the wave of change in the Arab world. At the time of living the bicentennial of our independence I recommend you listen and read our national anthem, a hymn to liberty and the defense of a free society based on respect for the individual.
-
http://elrepublicanoliberal.blogspot.com/
http://www.facebook.com/raul.amiel
http://webvideocall.oovoo.com/callme/raulamiel/268
@ raulamiel
amiel.movil.skype MAIL SHIPPING TO OUR AUTHORIZED PUBLICATION, TIMELINESS, VENEZUELA, opinions, news, REPUBLICAN Liberalism, democracy, liberal, liberal, Libertarian, POLICY, INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, UNITY, DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVE
0 comments:
Post a Comment